Relationship between clinical performance and professional self-concept in critical care nurses

2021-12-29 11:16NrgesEskndriMohmmdAsiMohmmdAsiniRezNorouzdeh
Frontiers of Nursing 2021年4期

Nrges Eskndri, Mohmmd Asi,*, Mohmmd Asini, Rez Norouzdeh

aSpiritual Health Research Centre, Qom University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Qom, Qom 37185, Iran bNursing and Midwifery Faculty, Shahed University, Tehran, Tehran 4419118651, Iran

Abstract: Objective: To determine the relationship between clinical performance and professional self-concept in critical care nurses.

Keywords: clinical performance • critical care unit • nurses • self-concept

1. Introduction

Among health-care providers, nurses spend more time caring for patients.1,2Providing good quality nursing services in all health-care systems is a concern.3As intensive care units (ICU) are equipped with new technologies, there is a general expectation from nurses that they have the skills to provide quality care.3,4Quality health care is defined as “acceptable levels of health services”, which are in line with up-to-date knowledge, leading to favorable health outcomes.5Given that providing quality services is the key to the success of health organizations, in the health system,the performance of nurses is an important guarantor for the desired health outcome. In this regard, Kahya and Oral (2018) suggest that frequent evaluation of nurses’performance ensures the optimal care and clinical outcome in the patient.6Usually, the quality of nursing care is evaluated in terms of the strengths and weaknesses of clinical practice to continuously improve nurses’ performance.7Nurses’ performance appraisal can help to understand the current situation and its compliance with clinical standards,6improve professional skills,8strengthen relationships, identify educational needs,9reinforce positive behaviors, and improve the working environment.10Today, improving the quality of care has received serious attention as one of the important indicators of health system accreditation.11Several studies have been conducted on the quality of nursing care in Iran. Some studies focus on the relatively high prevalence of nursing medication errors.7,12For example, a study shows that nurses’ performance in endotracheal tube suctioning and artificial airway removal is lower than expected.13Some studies have shown that nurses’performance in areas of cooperation and support is better than clinical assessment and conflict management.4,10Professional self-concept is one of the factors influencing nurses’ competencies to provide care.14The professional self-concept involves nurses’ information and beliefs about their own roles, values, and behaviors.15Therefore, professional self-concept is a necessity for nurses to perform proper clinical care.16It has been found that nurses with high professional selfconcept have more respect for the patient and more responsibility in performing clinical activities.15,17,18Several studies have examined the relationship between nurses’ performance and professional self-concept.Lee and Yang (2015) have concluded that the improvement of nurses’ professional self-concept improves their clinical performance.19Also, Badiyepeymaie Jahromi et al. (2015) reported a direct relationship between professional self-concept and nursing students’ performance in planning, interpersonal relationship, and leadership.14Considering the above, it can be seen that there is not much evidence regarding the relationship between the professional self-concept of intensive care nurses and their clinical performance. Studies conducted in Iran have focused on other topics, such as measuring the nurses’ professional self-concept and its correlation with working stress.20,21Also, a study in the selected university hospitals of Tehran reveals professional self-concept as the weakness in leadership among ICU nurses despite their relatively high scores in terms of knowledge dimension.22

The importance of addressing the issue of professional self-concept in nurses working in the ICU is due to the fact that these nurses always face a lot of stress in their workplace. At the same time, they must make decisions quickly without error in patients in critical conditions. Therefore, the authors became curious to examine the relationship between professional self-concept and the components of clinical performance of critical care nurses.

2. Methods

This descriptive correlational study was conducted in 2018 in ICU nurses working in intensive care settings (ICUs, CCU, dialysis, and emergency departments) of teaching hospitals of Medical Sciences, Qom,Iran. Three hundred and fifty nurses were involved in the study based on the reported standard deviation(SD = 23.67) in the Golestan study23with considering α = 0.05, β = 0.1, andd= 4. The inclusion criteria were a minimum of 6 months of work experience in the critical care unit, bachelor’s degree in nursing, and willingness to participate in the study.

Data collecting instruments were a demographic data sheet, nurse’s clinical performance questionnaire’(NCPQ), and nursing professional self-concept measure (NPSCM). The NCPQ includes 64 items on nurses’activities in eight subscales (i.e., clinical judgment, advocacy and moral agency, caring practices, facilitation of learning, collaboration, systems thinking, response to diversity, and clinical inquiry).4,24In Karimyar Jahromi(2013), the reliability of the Persian version of NCPQ has been confirmed (R= 0.83).4To determine the score of the nurse’s performance, the answer “yes” was given a score of “one” and “zero” for the response “no.” The total performance score and its related domains were 0–100. In this way, the score of each nurse is multiplied by the fraction (100 divided by the number of items).The level of performance was classified as 0–33 (poor),34–66 (average), and 67–100 (good). The NPSCM was designed by Cowin (2001) to assess the nurses’ professional self-concept.17The questionnaire contains a total of 36 items that represent six subscales: (1) general self-concept, (2) nursing care, (3) staff relations,(4) communication, (5) knowledge, and (6) leadership.Each subscale consists of six items and all items are responded to on a six-point Likert scale ranging from 1(complete disagree) to 6 (complete agree). The NPSCM makes a potential score range of 36–216.25The validity of the Persian version of NPSCM was confirmed by Badiyepeymaie-Jahromi et al. (2014) and also its reliability was confirmed (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.97).15

The data were analyzed by descriptive and analytic tests using SPSS software v. 22 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL,USA). Based on the K-S test results, all variables had a normal distribution. Therefore, the independent-sample t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)were used to compare the mean scores between the subgroups of the participants. Moreover, the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to examine the association between nurses’ performance and professional self-concept scores. The level of significance was 0.05.

This study was approved by the research ethics committee of Qom university of medical sciences (ethical approval code: IR.MUQ.REC.1396.85). All the participants were informed of the aim of the study. Verbal and written consents were obtained from all nurses. Identity protection, anonymity, voluntary participation, not being forced, and the right to withdraw from the study at any time were emphasized by the researcher. Participants were also assured that their information would remain confidential.

3. Results

Of the 350 questionnaires, 308 were suitable for analysis. The mean age of the participant nurses was 33.74 ± 7.01 years and 67 nurses (21.9%) were female. A total of 229 nurses (74.8%) were married.The mean work experience in the critical care unit was 6.71 ± 5.55 years. The clinical performance score in female nurses was significantly higher than in men(P< 0.030). As to the results of one-way ANOVA,there was a significant relationship between the professional self-concept with types of employment status (P= 0.005). Independent samples t-test showed asignificant relationship between clinical performance and gender (P= 0.030) (Table 1). In clinical performance, nurses had the highest mean score in clinical judgment (80.74 ± 21.64) (Table 2). Moreover, in professional self-concept, nurses had the highest mean score in general self-concept (36.60 ± 5.69). Using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, positive correlations were foundbetween the nursing professional self-concept scores and clinical performance so that an increase in the professional self-concept was accompanied by an increase in the clinical performance (Table 3).

Table 1. Relationship between nurses’ demographic characteristics with professional self-concept and clinical performance.

Table 2. The mean and SD of critical care nurses’ clinical performance, professional self-concept, and their subscales.

4. Discussion

In this study, the ability of intensive care nurses in clinical practice and their professional self-concept was studied. As seen in the results, nurses scored higher on the clinical judgment and lower on the clinical inquiry.Congruent with this finding, Karimyar Jahromi (2013) in evaluating the quality of performance of nurses in ICUs based on synergy model showed that nurses have been in good condition in terms of clinical judgment and the lowest performance was related to clinical research inquiry.4Clinical judgment is an important skill for nurses and the basis of safe and quality nursing care.26Clinical judgment is the inference that the nurse draws from the analysis of available information.27Sophisticated care requirements in ICUs lead nurses to always face important clinical judgments. Accordingly, for intelligent clinical judgments, intensive care nurses must have sufficient and up-to-date professional knowledge for clinical reasoning based on critical thinking and problem-solving skills to prioritize care and interact appropriately with the patient and the treatment team.28,29Nurses with such competencies are usually more self-expressive and make better clinical decisions in the patient care.30Nurses in this study show low competencies in the clinical inquiry. Similar studies in Iran also indicate a low score of clinical inquiry in nurses.4,10,31The clinical inquiry as an ongoing process of questioning andevaluating practice through research and experiential learning32can improve the quality of nursing care. However, several studies show the nurses’ inadequacy in this area.4,10,31

Table 3. Correlation between professional self-concept and clinical performance scores*.

Nurses’ low knowledge of research methods, the weakness of nurses’ education in clinical inquiry, poor access of nurses to research facilities, and lack of inservice training related to research have been cited as the major barriers to clinical inquiry in nursing.31,33,34

However, nurses have less confidence in research findings,35time constraints, and lack of ability to apply research findings to clinical practice.4,10,35,36

In this study, the overall score of the nursing selfconcept measure was about 61%. Nurses scored higher in the subscale of self-confidence and lower in the subscale of staff relations. In line with this finding, Golestan (2015) shows nurses’ score is 68% in the nursing self-concept measure.23A strong professional self-concept is especially important in critical care nurses due to their unstable and stressful work setting.37However, studies have reported that Iranian nurses suffer from poor professional self-concept.14,38This problem is attributed to reasons such as lack of knowledge, skills, management system, financial resources, and social image of the profession.31,39The present study demonstrates increasing professional self-concept improves the quality of nurses’ clinical performance. In this regard, a study shows that the positive self-concept is an endless source of energy for nurses to perform their duties and achieve their goals. This feature is especially important in stressful environments such as ICU, where there are patients with life-threatening conditions.23A strong and positive professional self-concept enhances the specialized knowledge and clinical skills of nurses, which, in turn,helps them improve their quality of care.21

The professional concept of nursing is formed as a result of the relationship between biological and environmental factors and education; so it can be concluded that the professional concept of nursing grows due to the interaction between human and environmental factors. Learning and training play an important role in the development of self-concept. Therefore, this issue needs special attention from education officials and policy makers in the nursing profession to the current situation. Due to the low score of nurses’ clinical research in this study, it is suggested that nurses become more familiar with research during their academic studies,they have sufficient research facilities (computer, internet, etc.) in the workplace, and their research should be supported and encouraged by hospital officials and nursing organizations.

5. Conclusions

On the findings of this study, professional self-concept and related domains including leadership, communication, staff relations, knowledge, caring, and self-confidence are significantly related to clinical performance and its domains include clinical judgment, advocacy,and moral agency, caring practices, collaboration, systems thinking, response to diversity, clinical inquiry, and facilitation of learning. In conclusion, the improvement of professional self-concept and its domains will improve nursing clinical performance in different domains.Therefore, strategies that strengthen professional selfconcept are recommended to improve nursing clinical performance.

Limitations

Since this was a cross-sectional study with a very limited number of participants, further studies on bigger populations are required to generalize these results.

Acknowledgments

The authors of this article thank all the nurses who participated in this study and also the Vice Chancellor for Research of Qom University of Medical Sciences.

Ethical approval

Ethical issues are not involved in this paper.

Conflicts of interest

All contributing authors declare no conflicts of interest.